<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brian Vickery (and the uneasy information scientists)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theoccasionalinformationist.com/2010/01/28/brian-vickery-and-the-uneasy-information-scientists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theoccasionalinformationist.com/2010/01/28/brian-vickery-and-the-uneasy-information-scientists/</link>
	<description>irregular thoughts on the information sciences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:32:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson In Washington State</title>
		<link>http://theoccasionalinformationist.com/2010/01/28/brian-vickery-and-the-uneasy-information-scientists/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Johnson In Washington State]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoccasionalinformationist.com/?p=263#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Regardless of advances in technology, Vickery insists, there are some fundamentals of information-related behaviour and of the organisation of information, which do not change. It is the business of the information scientist to investigate them, and to show their relevance in whatever information environment they may be instantiated. I think that is a message we would do well to hold on to.&quot;  Well sighted, and well said, as the summary of a fine tribute.  23/02/10]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Regardless of advances in technology, Vickery insists, there are some fundamentals of information-related behaviour and of the organisation of information, which do not change. It is the business of the information scientist to investigate them, and to show their relevance in whatever information environment they may be instantiated. I think that is a message we would do well to hold on to.&#8221;  Well sighted, and well said, as the summary of a fine tribute.  23/02/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

